Skip to content

Conversation

@aimensahnoun
Copy link
Member

@aimensahnoun aimensahnoun commented Jan 2, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Migrated project to pnpm (v10.0.0) as the package manager for consistent installs and caching
    • Renamed package to "request-commerce"
    • Added package manager configuration to enforce stricter dependency resolution, security-focused settings, and deterministic installs
    • Updated ignore rules to exclude pnpm debug logs and related temporary files

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@aimensahnoun aimensahnoun self-assigned this Jan 2, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 2, 2026

Walkthrough

Migrates the repository from npm to pnpm: CI workflows, cache keys, and scripts were switched to pnpm; a .npmrc with pnpm-related settings was added; package.json metadata updated to declare pnpm; .gitignore now ignores pnpm-debug.log*. (49 words)

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
CI/CD Workflow Migration
.github/workflows/build-and-lint.yml
Replaces npm commands with pnpm equivalents (pnpm install --frozen-lockfile, pnpm run ...), adds an Install pnpm step, switches Node cache keys/paths to use pnpm-lock.yaml and node_modules, and removes npm-specific cache entries.
Package Manager Configuration
.npmrc
Adds new npm/pnpm configuration options (minimum-age-seconds, strict-peer-dependencies, strict-ssl, ignore-scripts, prefer-offline, save-exact, shamefully-hoist) with explanatory comments.
Metadata & Ignore Rules
package.json, .gitignore
Updates package name to request-commerce and adds packageManager: "pnpm@10.0.0" to package.json; adds pnpm-debug.log* to .gitignore.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Pre-merge checks

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'chore: use pnpm instead of npm' accurately describes the primary change—migrating the project from npm to pnpm across workflows, configuration, and package management settings.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 14f6dab and 5162ce6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/build-and-lint.yml
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/build-and-lint.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Build

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4d82506 and 14f6dab.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/workflows/build-and-lint.yml
  • .gitignore
  • .npmrc
  • package.json
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file

**/*: - Only comment on issues that would block merging — ignore minor or stylistic concerns.

  • Restrict feedback to errors, security risks, or functionality-breaking problems.
  • Do not post comments on code style, formatting, or non-critical improvements.
  • Keep reviews short: flag only issues that make the PR unsafe to merge.
  • Limit review comments to 3–5 items maximum, unless additional blockers exist.
  • Group similar issues into a single comment instead of posting multiple notes.
  • Skip repetition — if a pattern repeats, mention it once at a summary level only.
  • Do not add general suggestions; focus strictly on merge-blocking concerns.
  • If there are no critical problems, respond with minimal approval (e.g., 'Looks good'). Do not add additional review.
  • Avoid line-by-line commentary unless it highlights a critical bug or security hole.
  • Highlight only issues that could cause runtime errors, data loss, or severe maintainability issues.
  • Ignore minor optimization opportunities — focus solely on correctness and safety.
  • Provide a top-level summary of critical blockers rather than detailed per-line notes.
  • Comment only when the issue must be resolved before merge — otherwise, remain silent.
  • When in doubt, err on the side of fewer comments — brevity and blocking issues only.
  • Avoid posting any refactoring issues

Files:

  • package.json
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/build-and-lint.yml (1)

39-39: > Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants